The Great Pacific Garbage Patch

Here is a blog post from Brad Pollina, who presented this at the EcoAction meeting last night:

The Great Pacific Garbage patch is a swirling mass of plastic debris located in the central North Pacific Ocean. Earth’s ocean currents carry plastic trash from all over the world to this area, known as the North Pacific Gyre. Current estimates of its extent range from the size of Texas to the size of the continental USA. Either way, it’s huge and it’s growing by the minute.

The debris field is composed of about 80 percent trash from land and 20 percent trash from cruiseships, oil rigs, cargo tankers and the like. To give some perspective, humans produce about 200 billion pounds of plastic each year, 20 billion pounds of which wind up in the oceans. Greenpeace estimates that 10 percent of the plastics produced each year ultimately wind up in the Great Pacific Garbate Patch. With that in mind, it becomes clear that a fair portion of plastic thrown away each year winds up in the garbage vortex, resulting in a debris field of about 3.5 million tons of plastic. In most areas, estimates put the depth of the plastic at about 90 feet.

And it doesn’t just sit there. Plastic waste doesn’t biodegrade- it only photodegrades- meaning it gets broken into smaller and smaller pieces without ever actually decomposing. This means once it’s in the ocean, it stays there forever.

Photodegraded plastic poses a constant threat to marine life and gets carried to shore by ocean currents, littering beaches with trash. One of the major problems is also the release and absorption toxins into the water.

Materials like polystyrene, which we know as styrafoam, release harmful chemicals into the water which become absorbed by other types of plastic debris. From there, animals often mistake the contaminated materials for food and thereby introduce these toxins into our food chain.

Estimates hold that 267 animal species worldwide are affected by the garbage patch’s debris and about 1 million die each year by consuming and getting caught up in the trash.

So what can we do?

Remember 80 percent of ocean trash comes from land. Moreover, single use plastics are filling our landfills and much of this waste is winding up in the ocean. That includes plastic water bottles, cutlery, food containers, and plastic bags.

On a personal level, reusing plastics and reducing your personal use will help halt the growth of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. This means, for starts, using non-disposable food packaging, shopping with cloth bags, and drinking from reusable water bottles.

Next time you have the option to use something disposable, think twice and spread the word that it could wind up in the ocean.

Influencing policy at the local government level is also a high priority. The direct link between solid waste and the pacific garbage patch can’t be stressed enough, so local ordinance changes outlawing plastic bags, styrafoam, and other non-biodegradable materials represents a step in the right direction.

We need to encourage and pressure our local governments to enact plastic bag and polystyrene bans- it’s already happening around the country and the movement away from plastic disposables is gaining speed. Many towns have even started burning waste in clean energy facilities, which helps ensure these materials can’t wind up in the garbage patch.

On the national level, this issue is roughly where global warming was 10 years ago. It hasn’t received much international attention but what the Project Kaisei team has done is inspiring and should set the trend for handling this issue.

We need to contact our Congress people and the EPA to encourage them to devote funds to studying this. The more exposure we bring to this looming problem, the better. Not many people know about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch right now so we need to spread awareness if we expect to ever properly address it.

These images are from: http://knowmanythings.files.wordpress.com/ and http://bgviewsnetwork.com/

Do you know where your food comes from? (Do you want to?)

Last Tuesday (on free-scoop day at Ben and Jerry's!), a few members of EcoAction trekked through the pouring rain to the National Geographic Society for an advance screening of Food, Inc. Sustainable eating is one of my main interests (mostly because I like eating), but this movie really examines where your food comes from and the implications of what you eat, as well as the effects.

Much like The Omnivore's Dilemma, this documentary focuses on where your food comes from. In this documentary, there are appearances by Michael Pollan (my personal favorite and author of The Omnivore's Dilemma), as well as other experts like Eric Schlosser (author of Fast Food Nation), Gary Hirshberg (founder of Stonyfield Farms), and Joel Salatin (owner of Polyface Farms, located not too far away from D.C., who was also a pivotal character in The Omnivore's Dilemma).

I think it's super interesting how important (and how overlooked) food is in our energy crisis - and how it's also a social, political, and economic issue.

As far as the environment goes, the major issue that this movie brings up is the cost (both in terms of dollar$ and carbon emissions) of transportation. We ship our food from all over the world because we, as human beings, have ceased to be seasonal eaters. We're used to eating, for example, bananas all year around.

But I found that this documentary also, interestingly, had a focus on politics. I found one woman in the documentary, Barbara Kowalcyk, to be particularly endearing. Her two-year old son had died from eating a hamburger contaminated with e.coli. It's the type of story most people would write off as merely tragic, but if you go back and question how the meat got contaminated with e.coli in the first place, it goes beyond tragic to appalling.

Basically, because we live in a country which has such a high demand for beef, we need to raise a lot of cows. We essentially trade quality for quantity, and end up raising cows in super-tight quarters. As a result, cows walk around and live in their own waste, and disease is rampant. But, as any biology student could probably tell you, e.coli sucks, but people can generally recover from.

Not quite. Because cows live in such tight quarters, and because cows are fed on corn-based meals*, they are given huge amounts of antibiotics. Again, as any biology student could tell you, the overuse of antibiotics leads to super bugs, such as super-dangerous strains of e.coli.

For more information about the Meat and Poultry Pathogen Reduction and Enforcement Act (a.k.a. Kevin's Law, H.R. 3160 in the 109th Congress), a law Barbara Kowalcyk is trying to pass for stricter food safety regulation, click here.

This was just one interesting aspect of Food, Inc. I highly recommend that you watch it... though the vast majority of the food was disturbing, but really important to see. After all, you are what you eat.



*Corn based meals for cows, because of government regulations, need to have certain amounts of protein and fat - often gotten from other cows, i.e. cannibalism. Also, cows are, by nature, grass eaters, which is why they have rumens. Because cows are fed corn rather than grass, the acidity in their stomachs increases and they are also put on multiple medications to prevent them from feeling sick. Just look up CAFO (Concentrated Animal Farm Operation) for more information.

Green Square

Earlier this month, on April 3rd, Project Hilltop worked with a myriad of groups (including ResLife, Green Corp, the Lecture Fund, GUSGI, InterHall, Campus Ministry, Outdoor Education, and, naturally, EcoAction) to organize Green Square!

Unfortunately, it was moved to the Leavey Center due to rain, but overall a super successful event! One of the big hits was ResLife's collection of plastic bags (you know you save them, too) to trade in for a free, reusable tote. More pictures after the jump!

Alice from EcoAction, who was advertising for Earth Week

InterHall, who collected plastic bags to trade in for those green totes


Campus Ministry, who served doughnuts


Mara from GUSGI and Jon from EcoAction, goofing off


My dear friend Adam, from Green Corp, who was selling Corp totes

Save the Clouded Leopards!

how cute are they?!

While you may have been trying to watch the fire-ball explosion near the Key Bridge off of the LXR rooftops (you know who you are), these adorable clouded leopards were born to the National Zoo.

Clouded leopards are vulnerable to extinction due to hunting and DEFORESTATION. For more information about clouded leopards, click here.

Thinking Outside the Bag

Currently, the District is considering imposing a 5 cent bag fee on both plastic and paper bags. Information can be found at trashfreeanacostia.com.

Here is a snippet from their release:

“Every year, 20,000 tons of trash enter the Anacostia River leaving a polluted, dirty and neglected river bordering our neighborhoods. According to the latest report, plastic bags, bottles, wrappers and Styrofoam make up 85% of the trash. In the tributaries of the Anacostia, such as Watts Branch, nearly 50% of the trash is plastic bags.

DC taxpayers spend millions every year cleaning bags and trash out of the Anacostia River. And soon, the EPA will establish heavy fines for the District every time trash exceeds its limit in the River — just about every time we have a heavy rain because of the city's outdated sewer system. The District has a great recycling program, but even with this, every bag recycled costs taxpayers money and bags still litter the River. The bags also cost stores money, raising the price of our groceries and other goods.

There's an alternative. Already, many stores sell low-cost durable, reusable bags. Some, like Giant, even give a credit if you bring back old bags instead of using new bags. Costco stopped offering bags years ago, and discount food stores like ALDI and Save-A-Lot, and even IKEA, charge customers a nominal fee for every bag — greatly reducing the number of plastic and paper bags used and encouraging customers to bring reusable bags. We need a small incentive to encourage shoppers to use reusable bags and to get cashiers to ask whether a bag is even needed.

New York, Seattle, and many European nations have already required, or plan to require, a small charge for plastic and paper bags. These initiatives have dramatically cut down on these single-use bags — by as much as 90% in some places. Councilmember Tommy Wells, along with many of his fellow Councilmembers, will be introducing a bill to place a nominal 5 cent fee for each plastic and paper carryout bag. The bill also requires that any single use carryout bags that stores use must be recyclable. The bill creates a new Anacostia River Fund that uses the fees to cleanup and protect the Anacostia River, transforming it into a positive, contributing asset where people feel safe to fish, boat, swim and enjoy.

This new initiative is great for the Anacostia River and great for our small businesses. We can take major steps to clean the Anacostia River on our watch, and businesses can be a part of the solution to reducing the number of bags that enter the trash and environmental streams. Reducing the number of bags used reduces the costs to businesses that provide the bags, and it saves taxpayers by cutting down on trash and recycling costs, environmental cleanup costs, and EPA fines.”

To make matters short, if you are a Georgetown student who has studied abroad anywhere in Europe, you have probably already experienced a bag fee, and it did not pose too much of a burden on you. There are a few easy options in this case:

1) REDUCE: Buy a canvas bag or other sort of reusable tote. More and more stores are selling these nowadays, and they tend to be cheap (if you are not looking to buy an elaborate, custom-made one). You'll make a small investment, and they will last you a long time. They also can have other purposes. For example, I use mine as duffel bags, per se, when I go home for breaks because, just as they can hold food, they can hold clothing.

2) REUSUE: If you don't want to have to buy a bag of your own, then why not just bring back the plastic bags you already had? Take a few bags, tie them up, squash them together, and you have a pretty light plastic bag ball that can easily fit in a jacket pocket.

3) RECYCLE: The last option is to just pay the 5 cent tax. 5 cents per bag will not have a noticeable effect on your grocery bill. If you have four bags a week, that will only total 20 cents, and for all 52 weeks of the year, that is just over $10--negligible in light of the overall cost of the grocery bill. And, when you are done with the bag, recycle it. Although the plastic bag recycling industry is weak because there is no use for the recycled plastic from the bags yet, you can still put them separate of both trash and recycling here in the District so that, one hopes, something good comes from them. Perhaps they will just get burned for fuel as the trash on campus does.